An Eye For An Eye: Meaning, History & Modern Relevance - Beritaja
By: Albert Michael - Thursday, 02 October 2025 15:16:23
Getty Images
Quick answer: “An eye for an eye” refers to the legal principle lex talionis — a rule of proportional retaliation that appears in early legal codes (e.g., the Code of Hammurabi) and in the Bible (Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy). Historically it limited private vengeance by prescribing equivalent penalties; over time many legal systems replaced literal retaliation with monetary compensation or state-administered punishment. Today the phrase frames debates about retribution, deterrence, and restorative justice.
Definition: Lex talionis — literally “law of retaliation” — the idea that a punishment should be proportionate to the offence (often expressed historically as literal reciprocity: “eye for eye, tooth for tooth”).
Introduction
The phrase “an eye for an eye” is one of the oldest legal principles, often misunderstood as endorsing revenge. Found in the Code of Hammurabi, the Hebrew Bible, and echoed across cultures, it shaped debates about justice, punishment, and morality for centuries.
Origins in Ancient Law
The Code of Hammurabi
One of the earliest references appears in the Babylonian Code of Hammurabi (c. 1754 BCE):
“If a man destroy the eye of another man, they shall destroy his eye. If he break another man’s bone, they shall break his bone.” (Hammurabi 196–197)This principle, called lex talionis (law of retaliation), was intended to limit excessive retribution by ensuring punishments matched offenses.
Other Ancient Systems
- Hittite laws – more flexible, often replaced retaliation with fines.
- Roman law (Lex Talionis) – established proportionality but often converted injury into compensation.
Biblical and Religious Interpretations
Hebrew Bible
The phrase appears in Exodus 21:24: “eye for eye, tooth for tooth.” Similar verses are found in Leviticus 24:19–20 and Deuteronomy 19:21.
Rabbinic Judaism
The Talmud interprets these verses not literally but as requiring monetary compensation, emphasizing fairness and restraint over revenge.
Christianity
Jesus references the law in Matthew 5:38–39, contrasting it with the principle of turning the other cheek — reframing justice as forgiveness.
Islam
The Qur’an also cites this law (Al-Ma’idah 5:45) but strongly encourages forgiveness and charitable alternatives to strict retaliation.
Philosophical and Ethical Debates
Retribution vs. Restoration
Scholars debate whether lex talionis supports pure retribution or serves as a check against excessive punishment. Modern restorative justice movements often cite it as a contrast to more constructive solutions.
The Gandhi Quote
The famous line “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind” is widely attributed to Mahatma Gandhi. However, according to Quote Investigator, there is no documented evidence he actually said or wrote it.
Modern Applications and Misinterpretations
- Death penalty debates – invoked as justification for capital punishment.
- Case study: In 2025, an Alabama inmate petitioned for execution citing belief in “an eye for an eye.” (NYPost)
- International law: Human rights organizations often contrast lex talionis with rehabilitation-based justice systems.
Legacy and Influence
Despite its ancient origins, “an eye for an eye” continues to shape legal and ethical thought worldwide. From Hammurabi to modern courts, the debate over punishment and proportionality remains central to human justice.
Timeline — Key dates & texts
| Period | Item |
| c. 2100–1800 BCE | Early Near Eastern codes (Ur-Nammu, Lipit-Ištar) — precursors |
| c. 1754 BCE | Code of Hammurabi — talionic laws inscribed |
| 1st millennium BCE | Hebrew Bible texts (Exodus, Leviticus, Deuteronomy) contain talionic language |
| Medieval | Wergild and monetary compensation systems in Germanic law |
| Modern | Debates about retribution, deterrence, restorative justice; quote-provenance investigations |
FAQ
What does “an eye for an eye” mean?
It denotes a principle of proportional retaliation (lex talionis). Historically it could be literal, but most societies and legal traditions worked toward monetary compensation, judicial adjudication, or other non-literal forms of restitution.
Is “an eye for an eye” in the Bible?
Yes. Verses such as Exodus 21:23–25 include talionic language. Later Jewish legal interpretation often emphasized compensation and adjudication rather than literal physical retaliation.
Did Gandhi say “An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind”?
Variants of this aphorism are commonly attributed to Gandhi. The exact original phrasing and provenance are debated among quote-researchers; consult a quote-provenance source (e.g., Quote Investigator) for precise sourcing.
